In contrast, a slow response is the
gradual increase in perfusion or skin oxygenation over multiple treatment
sessions 1, 2. A slow response has been clinically noted by many
investigators employing transcutaneous 1, 3 and epidural 2
high voltage electrotherapy.
Note: This slow response or gradual increase in perfusion and reoxygenation is due to the stimulation of angiogenesis. After several weeks this growth of new healthy capillaries will provide significant increases in perfusion and oxygenation. The fast response to a single session of HVPC is due to two factors. The first is nerve stimulation at the electrode that can cause a local vasodilation that lasts under an hour. The second is increased levels of nitric oxide or endothelial-relaxing factor this can increase tissue perfusion for over 6 hours.
Claeys
et al 2 found epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation was associated with reoxygenation of skin around ischemic leg and foot ulcers. Positive
polarity provides protection in ischemic wounds. During several months of daily spinal electrotherapy, wounds closed and ischemic pain was reduced in cases where resting TcPO2 increased. After electrotherapy ended,
TcPO2 was within normal limits at the 1-year follow-up.
- Lundeberg T, Kjartansson J, Samuelsson U. Effect of electrical nerve stimulation on healing of ischaemic skin flaps. Lancet 1988; 2:712–4.
- Claeys L, Horsch, S. Transcutaneous oxygen pressure as predictive parameter for ulcer healing in endstage vascular patients treated with spinal cord stimulation. International Angiology 1996; 15:344–
- Likar B, Poredos P. Effects of electric current on partial oxygen tension in skin surrounding wounds. Wounds 1993; 5:32–46.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.